World News, Finance, Lifestyle, Health, Entertainment, Music, Sports, Science, Space ...
▼
Apr 15, 2022
SECRET CODE behind key type of memory revealed in new brain scans, Apr 15, 2022
(Image credit: Boris SV via Getty Images)
The "secret code" the brain uses to create a key type of memory has finally been cracked.
This
type of memory, called working memory, is what allows people to
temporarily hold on to and manipulate information for short periods of
time. You use working memory, for example, when you look up a phone
number and then briefly remember the sequence of digits in order to
dial, or when you ask a friend for directions to a restaurant and then
keep track of the turns as you drive there.
The
new work represents a "fundamental step forward" in the study of
working memory, Derek Nee, an assistant professor of psychology and
neuroscience at Florida State University, told Live Science in an email.
CLOSE
A critical process
For decades, scientists have wondered how and where the brain encodes transient memories.
One
theory suggests that working memory relies on special "storehouses" in
the brain, separate from where the brain handles incoming sensory
information from the eyes
or nose, for instance, or where long-term memories — like memories of
who you attended prom with, or foundational knowledge you learned in
school — are stored, said Nee, who was not involved in the new study.
Another,
opposing theory suggests that "there are no such special storehouses,"
Nee told Live Science. In this alternate theory, working memory is
essentially an emergent phenomenon — one that shows up "when sensory and
motor representations are kept around as we link the past to the
future," Nee said. According to this theory, the same brain cells light
up when you first read through a phone number as do when you run through
that number again and again in working memory.
The new study, published April 7 in the journal Neuron,
challenges both of these theories. Rather than reflecting what happens
during perception or relying on special memory storehouses, working
memory seems to operate one step up from sensory information gathering;
it extracts only the most relevant sensory information from the
environment and then sums up that information in a relatively simple
code.
"There
have been clues for decades that what we store in [working memory]
might be different from what we perceive," study senior author Clayton
Curtis, a professor of psychology and neural science at New York
University (NYU), told Live Science in an email.
To
solve the mysteries of working memory, Curtis and co-author Yuna Kwak, a
doctoral student at NYU, used a brain scanning technique called
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures changes in
blood flow to different parts of the brain. Active brain cells require
more energy and oxygen, so fMRI provides an indirect measure of brain
cell activity.
The
team used this technique to scan the brains of nine volunteers while
they performed a task that engaged their working memory; the two study
authors also completed the task and contributed brain scans to the
study.
In
one of the trials, the participants viewed a circle composed of
gratings, or slashes, on a screen for roughly four seconds; the graphic
then disappeared, and 12 seconds later, the participants were asked to
recall the angle of the slashes. In other trials, the participants
viewed a cloud of moving dots that all shifted in the same direction,
and they were asked to recall the exact angle of the dot cloud's motion.
"We
predicted that participants would recode the complex stimulus" — the
angled grating or moving dots — "into something more simple and relevant
to the task at hand," Curtis told Live Science. Participants were only
asked to pay attention to the orientation of the slashes or angle of the
dot cloud's motion, so the researchers theorized that their brain
activity would reflect only those specific attributes of the graphics.
And when the team analyzed the brain scan data, that's just what they found.
The
researchers used computer modeling to visualize the complex brain
activity, creating a kind of topographical map representing peaks and
valleys of activity in different groups of brain cells. Brain cells that
process visual data have a specific "receptive field," meaning they
activate in response to stimuli that appear in a particular zone of a
person's visual field. The team took these receptive fields into account
in their models, which helped them understand how the participants'
brain activity related to what they'd observed on-screen during the
memory task.
This
analysis revealed that, instead of encoding all of the fine details of
each graphic, the brain stored only the relevant information needed for
the task at hand. When viewed on the topographical maps, the brain
activity used to encode this information looked like a simple, straight
line. The angle of the line would match the orientation of the gratings
or the angle of the dot cloud's motion, depending on which graphic the
participants had been shown.
These
line-like brain activity patterns appeared in the visual cortex, where
the brain receives and processes visual information, and the parietal
cortex, a key region for memory processing and storage.
What's
crucial isn't that the brain settled on using lines to represent the
images. "It is the fact that the representation has been abstracted from
gratings [or] motion to something different," Nee said.
One
limitation of the study is that the team used very simplistic graphics,
which don't necessarily reflect the visual complexity of the real
world, Nee noted. This limitation extends to many studies of working
memory, and Nee said he uses similar simple graphics in his own
research.
"The
field will need to move towards richer stimuli that better match our
natural visual experiences to bring us from the laboratory to practical
utility," he said. But with that in mind, the new study still "provides a
novel insight into what it means to hold something online in mind for
the future," he said.
Working
memory essentially acts as a bridge between perception (when we read a
phone number) and action (when we dial that number). "This study, in
identifying a representational format that resembles neither what was
perceived nor what will be done but can be clearly read out from visual
signals, offers an unprecedented look into this mysterious intermediate
zone between perception and action," Nee said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No adult content please.
Articles accepted having references.
No advertisement accepted.